Langert v. David

Citations

• 14 Wash. 389
• 44 P. 875
• 1896 Wash. LEXIS 378

Syllabus

<p>APPEAL — FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE — ASSIGNMENT OF JUDGMENT BY CLIENT TO ATTORNEY.</p> <p>Without an appeal a party will not he heard in an appellate court to question the correctness of the judgment of the trial court.</p> <p>The fact that an attorney, in order to secure a debt of his client to himself, takes an assignment of a judgment with knowledge that his client is insolvent and had agreed to pay another creditor out of the proceeds thereof, does not constitute a fraudulent conveyance, although the amount of the judgment is greater than the debt for which it has been assigned.</p>