Skip to main content
· 10/5/1925

Langenbach v. Commissioner

Citations

  • 2 B.T.A. 777
  • 1925 BTA LEXIS 2261

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding appellants had protected privacy interest in public utility records
  • majority of justices concluding that no reasonable expectation of privacy exists in utility records under State Constitution
  • majority of justices concluding that no reasonable expectation of privacy exists in utility records under State Constitution
  • privacy interest in electricity consumption records kept by a municipal corporation
  • privacy interest in electricity consumption records kept by a municipal corporation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sternhagen, Artjndell, Green, Love

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.