Lange v. Misch

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing piercing of -5- No. 1-23-1705 the corporate veil within supplementary proceedings on appeal and directing the party seeking to pierce the corporate veil to file a separate action
• piercing the corporate veil in a supplementary pro- ceeding is improper
• judgment creditor should have filed and on remand could still file separate action to pierce corporate veil
• citation proceeding may not impose liability on a third party absent proof that the party holds debtor assets
• statute does not authorize “the entry of a judgment at a supplementary proceeding against a third party who does not possess assets of the judgment debtor”
• veil piercing improper in a supplementary proceeding; 21 No. 1-25-0546 separate petition required

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).