Lange v. Minton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing Salem ordinance that prohib- ited the possession of “[a]n exotic, wild, or dangerous animal”
• discussing Salem ordinance that prohib- ited the possession of “[a]n exotic, wild, or dangerous animal”
• discussing Salem ordinance that prohib- ited the possession of “[a]n exotic, wild, or dangerous animal”
• assessing tort liability for ordinance prohibiting the possession of exotic, 6 Although the legislature did not enact any law concerning “dangerous” ani- mals until 2005, Or Laws 2005, ch 840, § 2(2) (setting out “the crime of maintain- ing a dangerous dog”
• assessing tort liability for ordinance prohibiting the possession of exotic, 6 Although the legislature did not enact any law concerning “dangerous” ani- mals until 2005, Or Laws 2005, ch 840, § 2(2) (setting out “the crime of maintain- ing a dangerous dog”
• assessing tort liability for ordinance prohibiting the possession of exotic, 6 Although the legislature did not enact any law concerning “dangerous” ani- mals until 2005, Or Laws 2005, ch 840, § 2(2) (setting out “the crime of maintain- ing a dangerous dog”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).