· 4/4/1927
Lange v. George D. Emery Co.
Citations
- 18 F.2d 744
- 1927 U.S. App. LEXIS 2046
- 1927 A.M.C. 844
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that voluntary disclosure of privileged communications is inconsistent with an assertion of the attorney-client privilege
- reviewing attorney-client privilege questions de novo because the court believed them to be “legal questions, not questions of fact”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hand, Manton, Swan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.