Skip to main content
· 4/4/1927

Lange v. George D. Emery Co.

Citations

  • 18 F.2d 744
  • 1927 U.S. App. LEXIS 2046
  • 1927 A.M.C. 844

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that voluntary disclosure of privileged communications is inconsistent with an assertion of the attorney-client privilege
  • reviewing attorney-client privilege questions de novo because the court believed them to be “legal questions, not questions of fact”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hand, Manton, Swan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.