Lange v. Benedict

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the doctrine of collateral estoppel is part of the Fifth Amendment and will preclude a prosecutor from bringing new charges that were necessarily resolved in a prior criminal charge

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Allard v. Estes
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1935-09-25· cited 34×
• State v. Savage
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-07-08· cited 14×
• People v. Horvat
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1974-09-23· cited 13×
• Fox v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 1985-04-17· cited 9×
• United States v. Phillips Petroleum Co.
  N.D. Oklahoma· 1977-07-05· cited 8×
• Poysa v. State
  New York State Court of Claims· 1979-12-19· cited 7×
• Santangelo v. State
  New York State Court of Claims· 1980-03-31· cited 7×
• Collins v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 1988-02-24· cited 6×
• United States v. Williams
  N.D. Indiana· 1974-12-19· cited 1×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Basset v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1870-01-24· cited 60×
• McManus v. O'Sullivan
  Supreme Court· 1876-02-18· cited 4×