Skip to main content
· 2/19/1980

Lang v. Oklahoma

Citations

  • 444 U.S. 1091
  • 100 S. Ct. 1056
  • 62 L. Ed. 2d 779
  • 1980 U.S. LEXIS 895

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that codification of secrecy obligations into criminal law was indicative of substantial foreign interest
  • explaining that additional factors were product of international comity inquiry adopted by Second Circuit, which was \derived from Section 40 of the Restatement (Second) of the Foreign Relations Law of the United States (1965)\
  • noting “reduced degree of importance of the requested discovery in light of’ other information produced
  • contrasting a higher U.S. interest in compelling disclosure in suits “infused with the public interest,” such as those involving “antitrust, commodities, and racketeering statutes”
  • declining to order discovery in part because the objecting party was “no longer a primary defendant ... and stands, instead, as to the plaintiffs, in the posture of a non-party witness”
  • declining to order discovery in part because the objecting party was “no longer a primary defendant ... and stands, instead, as to the plaintiffs, in the posture of a non-party witness”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.