· 7/31/2008
Lanfear v. Home Depot, Inc.
Citations
- 536 F.3d 1217
- 44 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1614
- 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 16243
- 21 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 951
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “District courts have discretion to excuse the exhaustion requirement when resort to administrative remedies would be futile or the remedy inadequate.”
- “When a plaintiff makes a plausible argument that a federal statute creates 21 his right to relief, the district court has subject-matter jurisdiction over that complaint.”
- [P]laintiffs in ERISA actions must exhaust available administrative remedies before suing in federal court.”
- “The former employees plausibly argue that they are participants entitled to sue for breach of fiduciary duty. Because the former employees’ argument for participant status is plausible, the district court had subject-matter jurisdiction.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Edmondson, Pryor, Johnson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.