Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 6/11/2010
Laney v. Garmon
Citations
- 66 So. 3d 766
- 2010 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 159
- 2010 WL 2342402
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The fact that the county did not consider the disputed roadway to be a county road and that it did not maintain the disputed roadway is . . . insufficient to prove abandonment.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Thomas, Thompson, Pittman, Moore, Bryan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Philpot v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama· 2002-06-14· cited 145×
- Waltman v. RowellSupreme Court of Alabama· 2005-05-20· cited 136×
- Fadalla v. FadallaSupreme Court of Alabama· 2005-11-18· cited 134×
- Dennis v. DobbsSupreme Court of Alabama· 1985-06-28· cited 133×
- Retail Developers of Alabama, LLC v. East Gadsden Golf Club, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama· 2007-11-16· cited 106×
- Water Works & Sanitary Sewer Bd. v. ParksSupreme Court of Alabama· 2007-07-13· cited 85×
- Ayers v. StidhamSupreme Court of Alabama· 1954-03-04· cited 31×
- Auerbach v. ParkerSupreme Court of Alabama· 1989-04-28· cited 16×
- Laney v. GarmonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2009-06-05· cited 7×
- Fox Trail Hunting Club v. McDanielCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2000-12-15· cited 5×
- Autry v. Clarke CountySupreme Court of Alabama· 1992-05-22· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.