Lane v. Vitek Real Estate Industries Group

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• taking notice of publicly-recorded documents related to mortgage because “they 18 are matters of public record whose accuracy cannot be questioned.”
• rejecting plaintiffs’ contention that none of the defendants had authority to foreclose because their loan was packaged and resold in the secondary market, where it was put into a trust pool and securitized
• taking judicial notice of court documents relating to a plaintiff’s bankruptcy proceedings
• “the statute broadly 22 allows a trustee, mortgagee, beneficiary, or any of their agents to initiate non-judicial 23 foreclosure”
• “The argument that parties lose their interest in a loan when it is assigned to a trust pool has also been rejected by many district courts.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).