Skip to main content

Lane v. State

Citations

  • 479 S.E.2d 350
  • 223 Ga. App. 740
  • 96 Fulton County D. Rep. 2891
  • 1996 Ga. App. LEXIS 800

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding no need to address this issue because no evidence witness who allegedly made a prior false allegation of molestation reported the molestation at issue
  • holding no need to address this issue because no evidence witness who allegedly made a prior false allegation of molestation reported the molestation at issue
  • proffered testimony not based on expert's personal knowledge or facts admitted in evidence and trial court did not abuse discretion in excluding testimony
  • proffered testimony not based on expert’s personal knowledge or facts admitted in evidence and trial court did not abuse discretion in excluding testimony
  • trial court is not required to give relief that a party has not requested
  • trial court did not abuse its discretion when it limited examination regarding a victim’s relative’s prior false accusation when the relative was not the person to report the crime charged in the case-in-chief

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ruffin, McMurray, Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.