Skip to main content
· 3/3/1919

Lane v. Pueblo of Santa Rosa

Citations

  • 249 U.S. 110
  • 39 S. Ct. 185
  • 63 L. Ed. 504
  • 1919 U.S. LEXIS 2232

Syllabus

<p>The Pueblo of Santa Rosa is a legal entity, with capacity to maintain a suit to protect its rights in land claimed by it as a grantee under the laws of Spain and Mexico. P. 112. Cherokee Nation v. Georgia, 5 Pet. 1, distinguished.</p> <p>This status of the Pueblo, if it did not previously exist, resulted from a law of the Territory of New Mexico, and from acts of Congress extending the laws of that Territory over the region acquired by the Gadsden Treaty, and over the Territory of Arizona, when the latter was organized; and it was not affected by the creation of the State of Arizona. Id.</p> <p>Assuming that these Indians are wards of the Government, that fact would not affect the capacity of the Pueblo to sue in the District of Columbia, to restrain the Secretary of the Interior and the Commissioner of the General Land Office from offering, listing, etc., under the public land laws, lands in Arizona to which the Pueblo alleges perfect title under the laws of Spain and Mexico. P. 113.</p> <p>In such a suit, where the trial court dismissed the bill on defendants’ motion, held, error for the Court of Appeals, finding the bill made a case for the relief sought, to award a permanent injunction; for defendants were entitled to answer to the merits as if their motion had been overruled originally. P. 114..</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that United States could not alienate trust lands currently occupied by Native Americans
  • holding that United States could not alienate trust lands currently occupied by Native Americans
  • even in the absence of a treaty or statute protecting Indian lands from sale by the Government, the court could enjoin the Government from treating Indian lands as public lands and disposing of them under public land laws
  • lands beneficially owned by Pueblo not public lands

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Van Devanter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.