Lane v. Ocosta School District No. 172

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[s]ince no fundamental right [of the plaintiffs’] has been violated, the court did not have the jurisdiction to determine whether the school board’s action was arbitrary or capricious”
• denying de novo review under RCW 28A.88.015 for school board's administrative decision to change location of bus stops
• denying de novo review under RCW 28A.88.015 for school board's administrative decision to change location of bus stops

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).