Skip to main content

Lane v. Lane

Citations

  • 553 So. 2d 1150
  • 1989 WL 105600

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the trial court should have reserved jurisdiction to award 9 SC-2024-0743 the wife periodic alimony in the future because her assets were \not so great as to survive a long period of time\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ingram

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.