Lane v. Kindercare Learning Centers, Inc

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the trial court properly concluded that plaintiff had no private cause of action based on the alleged violations of the child care organizations act” because, in part, the statute contained criminal penalties
• finding no implied cause of action against a private party for violating the child care organizations act, MCL 722.111 et seq.
• finding no implied cause of action against a private party for violating the child care organizations act, MCL 722.111 et seq.
• upholding denial of a motion to amend since the proposed amendment restated much of the same allegations
• “An amendment is futile if it merely restates the allegations already made or adds allegations that still fail to state a claim.”
• “[T]his Court will not reverse where the trial court reached the right result for the wrong reason.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).