Lane v. Fein, Such and Crane, LLP

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that serving a state court complaint with an allegedly false statement was not harassing under section 1692d
• finding that misstatement in state complaint was not materially false or misleading under FDCPA
• finding that a misstatement was “not materially false or misleading” under the FDCPA
• finding that a misstatement was “not materially false or misleading” under the FDCPA
• finding that a misstatement was “not materially false or misleading” under the FDCPA
• dismissing claim when “none of the conduct alleged by the plaintiffs is similar in seriousness to any of the[ ] examples” set forth in Section 1692d

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).