Lane v. Borst

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• agreeing with the plaintiff that “the amendment to the SPD granting discretionary authority to the Plan Administrator does not apply to [the plaintiff’s] claim because his right to disability benefits vested prior to CIGNA’s amendment of the Plan”
• “Long-term disability plans fall within ERISA’s definition of an employee benefit welfare plan.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).