Missouri Court of Appeals· 4/8/2014
Lane House Construction, Inc. v. Ogrowsky
Citations
- 427 S.W.3d 882
- 2014 WL 1377503
- 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 376
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating “the plain, unambiguous, and simple directive of Rule 59.01 controls” when deciding whether Rule allowed premature propounding of requests for admission
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ahrens, Norton, Richter
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri· 1993-04-20· cited 2,373×
- Daugherty v. City of Maryland HeightsSupreme Court of Missouri· 2007-08-07· cited 161×
- State Ex Rel. Ballew v. HawkinsMissouri Court of Appeals· 1962-10-11· cited 23×
- State Ex Rel. Vee-Jay Contracting Co. v. NeillSupreme Court of Missouri· 2002-11-26· cited 18×
- State ex rel. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. v. GallagherSupreme Court of Missouri· 1991-06-11· cited 16×
- Eastern Missouri Coalition of Police, Fraternal Order of Police, Lodge 15 v. City of ChesterfieldSupreme Court of Missouri· 2012-11-20· cited 14×
- Hanks v. ReesMissouri Court of Appeals· 1997-01-31· cited 13×
- Dynamic Computer Solutions, Inc. v. Midwest Marketing Insurance Agency, L.L.C.Missouri Court of Appeals· 2002-12-17· cited 10×
- Allison v. TysonMissouri Court of Appeals· 2003-10-14· cited 9×
- Lyon Financial Service, Inc. v. Harris Cab Co.Missouri Court of Appeals· 2010-01-26· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.