Landscape Properties, Inc., Debtor in Possession, C. Richard Crockett Crockett & Brown, Pllc v. Joe D. Whisenhunt Robert A. Vogel Richard C. Downing

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that after plaintiff’s motion to amend its complaint to add additional claims was denied in first suit, those claims were barred in subsequent suit by claim preclusion
• affirming district court’s award of Rule 11 sanctions in the same circumstances
• affirming district court’s award of Rule 11 sanctions in the same circumstances
• after plaintiffs motion to amend its complaint to add additional claims against the same defendants was denied in first suit, in subsequent suit those claims were barred by claim preclusion
• referral of Rule 11 violation to other judges in the district to determine whether any disciplinary actions should be taken against counsel “was not itself a sanction”
• “It is well settled that denial of leave to amend constitutes res judicata on the merits of the claims which were the subject of the proposed amended pleading.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).