· 12/21/2000
Landry v. Daigrepont
Citations
- 35 S.W.3d 265
- 2000 Tex. App. LEXIS 8628
- 2000 WL 1877124
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that arguing motion for new trial and approving order both constituted general appearances even though written motion was expressly subject to special appearance
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Chief Justice Seerden and Justices Hinojosa and Yaãez
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.