Skip to main content
· 12/21/2000

Landry v. Daigrepont

Citations

  • 35 S.W.3d 265
  • 2000 Tex. App. LEXIS 8628
  • 2000 WL 1877124

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that arguing motion for new trial and approving order both constituted general appearances even though written motion was expressly subject to special appearance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Chief Justice Seerden and Justices Hinojosa and Yaã‘ez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.