Landry v. Caffery Central Sugar Refinery & Railroad

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that letter that could only be obtained from FDA through a FOIA request was not susceptible to judicial notice
• declining to take notice of an agency guidance letter where defendants “obtained a copy of [the] letter, not from the [agency]’s website, but from a Freedom Information Act request”
• denying motion to transfer venue in action alleging violations of, inter alia, N.Y. Gen. Bus. Law § 349 because none of the alleged unlawful conduct occurred in the proposed transferee venue
• “[I]f [FDA letters are] judicially noticeable, this Court would be unable to consider the facts for the truth of the matter asserted.”
• “[T]he majority of cases in this district only convert [Rule] 12(b)(6) motions to ones for summary judgment where a party has explicitly asked for that relief.”
• “[C]ourts may take judicial notice of public documents and matters of public record.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).