Skip to main content
· 11/4/2011

Landrum v. CHIPPENHAM AND JOHNSTON-WILLIS

Citations

  • 717 S.E.2d 134
  • 282 Va. 346
  • 2011 Va. LEXIS 224

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a trial court abuses its discretion “by giving significant weight to an irrelevant or improper factor”
  • enumerating options available to the trial court for failing “to obey an order to provide or permit discovery” (quoting Rule 4:12(b)(2))
  • “Nothing . . . demands that a trial court first determine whether a party’s failure to obey an order has caused another party to suffer prejudice before it may impose a sanction.”
  • embracing the Fourth Circuit’s definition of abuse of discretion
  • embracing the Fourth Circuit’s definition of abuse of discretion
  • analyzing abuse of discretion standard

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Donald W. Lemons

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.