Landriscina v. Raygo-Wagner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding “no inherent consumer interest implicated in a construction contract between a general contractor and a subcontractor”
• noting the ICFA was not intended to cover routine breach of contract claims
• Illinois is a fact-pleading state and factual deficiencies cannot be cured by liberal construction
• estoppel may be shown where a party has detrimentally relied on the other party’s conduct
• plaintiff’s failure to include proposed amendment in the record provides sufficient basis for affirmance of the trial court
• plaintiff’s failure to include proposed amendment in the record provides sufficient basis for affirmance of the trial court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).