Landis v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Dismissal with prejudice of the fourth complaint was warranted because the amendment of the third complaint failed to comply with the district court’s earlier order.”
• \Pro se litigants should be granted appropriate latitude in their dealings with courts and counsel for correct and honorable reasons.\
• Although they do not have “unbridled license” to clearly disregard court orders, “[p]ro se litigants should be granted appropriate latitude in their dealings with courts and counsel . . . .”
• “Pro se litigants should be granted appropriate latitude in their dealings with courts and counsel for correct and honorable reasons. But being a pro se litigant does not give a party unbridled license to disregard clearly communicated court orders.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).