Skip to main content
· 12/6/1989

Landis v. AMERICAN INTERINSURANCE EXCH., INC.

Citations

  • 542 N.E.2d 1351
  • 1989 WL 102573

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that it is reasonable for a consumer to believe that a part of the premium is for underinsured coverage when the declaration page indicates that the premium for underinsured coverage is included in the premium for uninsured coverage
  • noting underinsurance clause was ambiguous and applying interpretation in favor of reasonable expectations of insured
  • noting underinsurance clause was ambiguous and applying interpretation in favor of reasonable expectations of insured
  • noting underinsurance clause was ambiguous and applying interpretation in favor of reasonable expectations of insured

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ratliff, Robertson, Baker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.