Skip to main content
· 4/8/1985

Landing Development Corp. v. City of Myrtle Beach

Citations

  • 329 S.E.2d 423
  • 285 S.C. 216
  • 1985 S.C. LEXIS 380

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • the availability of services to short-term tenants, which is an attribute of a motel, does not convert individually owned condominium units into a \motel\ as defined in the zoning ordinances
  • “To allow the city to repudiate its former interpretation of permissible rentals and the statements of its zoning director, based upon a re-assessment of the meaning of an undefined term in the ordinance!,] would be unconscionable.”
  • short-term rentals were permitted even though the ordinance required “permanent occupancy” because “no time limit is fixed in the zoning ordinance as to the length of rental property or any minimal rental period for permissible use within any zoning district.”
  • short-term rentals were permitted even though the ordinance required \permanent occupancy\ because \no time limit is fixed in the zoning ordinance as to the length of rental property or any minimal rental period for permissible use within any zoning district.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Coleman, Ness, Gregory, Harwell, Chandler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.