Skip to main content

Landers v. State

Citations

  • 402 S.W.3d 252
  • 2013 WL 3329332
  • 2013 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 985

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that requiring a motion for new trial to develop the record in a challenge to the imposition of court costs would allow a judge to “de facto alter the statutory time frames for motions for new trial”
  • reserving question of whether a motion for new trial is an appropriate vehicle
  • “An appellant fails to preserve error by failing to object when he had the opportunity[.]” (quoting Rickels v. State, 108 S.W.3d 900, 902 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Alcala, Cochran, Hervey, Johnson, Keasler, Keller, Meyers, Price, Womack

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

75 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.