Landers Auto Group Number One, Inc. v. Continental Western Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an identical \intended or expected injury\ exclusion prevented coverage of the insured's wrongful repossession of an automobile
• applying Arkansas law and concluding that the claims against the insured did not arise from the accident—mistakes in accounting—but from the subsequent intentional acts—repossessing the vehicle and failing to negotiate in good faith—taken by the insured

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).