Landeros v. Equity Property and Development

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• all holding that there is no duty to protect an individual upon the landowner's property unless a special relationship exists and the conduct is foreseeable
• where the “information was readily discoverable prior to the [original] hearing,” it did not qualify as newly discovered evidence and could be disregarded on a motion to reconsider
• all holding that there is no duty to protect an individual upon the landowner’s property unless a special relationship exists and the conduct is foreseeable
• “Trial courts should not allow a litigant to stand mute, lose a motion, and then frantically gather evidentiary material to show that the court erred in its ruling.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).