Lander Company, Inc. v. Mmp Investments, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a dispute is governed by both the Convention and the FAA because “nothing in the Convention or its history, or in the implementing legislation or its history, suggests exclusivity [from the FAA] . . . .”
• noting that Article V(l)(e) of the Convention contemplates the possibility of the award’s being set aside in a proceeding under local law
• finding jurisdiction with respect to a contract to sell products in Poland
• “To agree to binding arbitration is to agree that if your opponent wins the arbitration he can obtain judicial relief if you refuse to comply with the arbitrator’s award.”
• “Under the [Federal Arbitration] Act, if you fail to [timely] move to vacate an arbitration award you forfeit the right to oppose confirmation (enforcement) of the award if sought later by the other party.”
• “An arbitration award made in and sought to be enforced in the United States is a domestic award according to traditional principles of Anglo-American conflicts of law, under which the law of the place of the award determines whether the award is valid.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).