Landelius v. Sackellares

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that once disclosure of certain information is authorized, the party authorizing the disclosure cannot assert a claim based on the disclosure
• “There are some circumstances, however, wherein justice requires that a person be treated as though he had waived a right where he has done some act inconsistent with the assertion of such right and without regard to whether he knew he possessed it. This is the doctrine of estop-pel.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Maiden v. Rozwood
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1999-07-30· cited 2,570×
• Koontz v. Ameritech Services, Inc
  Michigan Supreme Court· 2002-06-12· cited 302×
• Reed Estate v. Reed
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2011-06-23· cited 51×
• Hageman v. Southwest General Health Center
  Ohio Supreme Court· 2008-07-09· cited 36×
• Darling v. Inter City Trucking
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1997-04-29· cited 4×
• Zgnilec v. General Motors Corp.
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1997-10-01· cited 3×
• Vernon v. Controlled Temperature, Inc.
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1998-07-14· cited 1×
• Woodman v. WCAC MEIJER COMPANIES LTD.
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2002-07-30
• Nicholas David Burnett v. Tracy Lynn Ahola
  Michigan Supreme Court· 2019-01-23
• Agnes N Cramer v. Transitional Health Services of Wayne
  Michigan Supreme Court· 2023-07-28

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Hamilton, Superintendent v. Verdow
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1980-05-23· cited 80×
• Duvall v. Goldin
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1984-12-03· cited 73×
• Domako v. Rowe
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1991-09-06· cited 71×
• Kelly v. Allegan Circuit Judge
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1969-09-03· cited 21×
• G. P. Enterprises, Inc. v. Jackson National Life Insurance
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1993-12-01· cited 10×