Landelius v. Sackellares

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that once disclosure of certain information is authorized, the party authorizing the disclosure cannot assert a claim based on the disclosure
• “There are some circumstances, however, wherein justice requires that a person be treated as though he had waived a right where he has done some act inconsistent with the assertion of such right and without regard to whether he knew he possessed it. This is the doctrine of estop-pel.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).