Landahl v. Chrysler Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the declarations page and accompanying endorsements were made part of a general commercial liability policy and were incorporated by reference into the policy regardless of whether the insured received actual delivery
• discussing exclusion of coverage for a fire that started while the insured was performing a roof repair, because “the scope of the activity covered by his policy ... was limited to ‘painting’”
• discussing exclusion of coverage for a fire that started while the insured was performing a roof repair, because “the scope of the activity covered by his policy ... was limited to ‘painting’”
• policy classification limitation limited policy to painting and, therefore, policy did not cover fire damage arising out of roofing repair work performed by insured

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).