Landa v. Century 21 Simmons & Co., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the option holders were “entitled to exercise their right of first refusal” with respect to the premises “despite the fact that [the landowner] contracted ... to sell the [premises] along with a separate ... parcel”
• holding that the option holders were “entitled to exercise their right of first refusal” with respect to the premises “despite the fact that [the landowner] contracted . . . to sell the [premises] along with a separate . . . parcel”
• reaching the same conclusion under a “collateral rights” exception to the merger rule
• right of first refusal as to particular tract in contract to convey other tract “remained executory and survived the deed”
• right of first refusal as to particular tract in contract to convey other tract “remained executory and survived the deed”
• the holder of a right of first refusal cannot be compelled to purchase more property than is subject to the right of first refusal or else forfeit the first refusal right

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).