Appellate Court of Illinois· 5/30/1985

Land v. Greenwood

Citations

478 N.E.2d 1203
133 Ill. App. 3d 537
88 Ill. Dec. 595
1985 Ill. App. LEXIS 1984

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

finding that plaintiff’s breach of contract claim was properly dismissed where it was “simply a restatement of the negligence count”
noting that because the cause of action remained viable at the time defendant was discharged as counsel, and plaintiff hired new counsel, plaintiff could not connect defendant’s conduct to any of plaintiffs damages
noting that because the cause of action remained viable at the time defendant was discharged as counsel, and plaintiff hired new counsel, plaintiff could not connect defendant's conduct to any of plaintiff's damages
“[A]n action for legal malpractice is one sounding in tort which arises out of a contract, express or implied, for legal services”
where plaintiffs cause of action remained viable at the time defendant attorney was discharged, “successor counsel had the duty to preserve his client’s cause of action”
second attorney could have averted involuntary dismissal by taking a voluntary nonsuit and refiling the action within one year

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Webber

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.