Skip to main content
· 4/5/1985

Land Use Regulation Commission v. Tuck

Citations

  • 490 A.2d 649
  • 1985 Me. LEXIS 686

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the requirement that a eontemnor be allowed to comply with the court order is an “essential ingredient” of a civil contempt sanction (quotation marks omitted)
  • applying law of civil contempt in an action alleging violations of a consent order
  • “[A] party may move to set aside a judgment for voidness under Rule 60(b)(4) if the court which rendered it ... acts in a manner inconsistent with due process.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McKusick, Nichols, Roberts, Violette, Glassman, Wernick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.