Land Resources Development v. Kaiser Aetna

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the district court did not err in admitting evidence where the probative value of such evidence was not substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice
• court stated that evidence relating to past crimes on the premises and to the location and character of defendant’s busi ness, a gambling casino, could provide the requisite foreseeability

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).