Lance Pruitt v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• requiring court to be able to “identify 12 and apply ‘the law of the state whose interest would be the more impaired if its law were not 13 applied”
• “California’s courts have frequently applied foreign laws that serve to protect businesses by limiting liability, even when applying that law precludes recovery by injured California residents.”
• “California's courts have frequently applied foreign laws that serve to protect businesses by limiting liability, even when applying that law precludes recovery by injured California residents.”
• applying the three-factor Ungaro-Benages test and the five-factor Timberlane test

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).