Lance Duncan v. Fernando Bustos and Bustos Law Firm, P.C.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that it was reasonable to approach a suspect's home to attempt to learn more through consensual questioning
• holding that officials' \affirmative actions\ must \directly increase the vulnerability of citizens to danger or otherwise place citizens in harm's way\
• concluding that the deliberate-indifference standard applied to the plaintiffs' substantive due process claim because the defendants not only had sufficient time to deliberate about their actions, but also engaged in deliberative actions
• holding that officials’ “affirmative actions” must “directly increase the vulnerability of citizens to danger or otherwise place citizens in harm’s way”
• concluding that it was reasonable to approach a suspect’s home to attempt to learn more through consensual questioning
• holding that the plaintiff “must demonstrate that the state acted No. 13-3119 Shreve et al. v. Franklin Cnty., Ohio et al. Page 13 with the requisite culpability to establish a substantive due process violation under the Fourteenth Amendment”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).