Lance Camper Manufacturing Corp. v. Republic Indemnity Co. of America

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “it is well settled that an action based on an implied-in-fact or quasi-contract cannot lie where there exists between the parties a valid express contract covering the same subject matter.”
• allowing a plaintiff, under Ohio law, to seek recovery for unjust enrichment on a claim within “the parameters of the contract” when there is an allegation of fraud or bad faith
• “[A]n action based on an implied-in-fact or quasi-contract cannot lie where there exists between the parties a valid express contract covering the same subject matter.”
• “The [Plaintiff] must allege that the express 21 contract is void or was rescinded in order to proceed with its quasi-contract claim.”
• “Finally, as to the Insured’s claim of unjust enrichment resulting in an implied-in-fact contract, it is well settled that an action based on an implied-in-fact or quasi-contract cannot lie where there exists between the parties a valid express contract covering the same subject matter.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).