Lancaster's Exor v. O'Brien

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the plaintiffs “speculative argument that, her termination ‘must have been’ related to her FMLA absences [was] insufficient at the summary judgment stage”
• finding plaintiff unqualified where plaintiff had ten unexcused absence over the course of three months after being absent for five weeks on FMLA leave
• granting summary judgment to the defendant where the record showed the plaintiff was absent for “five out of six weeks” during one period and the plaintiff failed to “propose or even accept a reasonable accommodation” that would have helped her attend work more regularly
• “For an employee whose primary difficulty was itself being at work, time off and reduced hours were logical, reasonable accommodations.”
• “For an employee whose primary difficulty was itself being at work, time off and reduced hours were logical, reasonable accommodations.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).