Lancaster's Admr. v. Central City Light & Power Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding borrower’s selection of “investment” on loan application was not dispositive when the only other options were primary or secondary residence and borrower intended to purchase a home for his children
• “Credit transactions made primarily for business, commercial, or agricultural purposes are exempt from RESPA.”
• “The fact that plaintiff has the means to buy a home for his child without seeking a profit from the purchase should not bar him from seeking relief under a federal statute designed to protect homeowners from abusive business practices.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).