Lancaster v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “It would be fundamentally unfair, as well as a violation of rule 3.220, to allow the state to negligently dispose of critical evidence and then offer an expert witness whose testimony cannot be refuted by the Defendant.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Muro
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-08-24· cited 6×
• Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles v. Charles
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-10-23· cited 5×
• Lawrence William Patterson v. State of Florida
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2016-08-25· cited 4×
• Lawrence William Patterson v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-11-23· cited 1×
• DEPT. OF HWY. SAFETY & M. VEH. v. Charles
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-10-23
• State v. Dubose
  Florida Circuit Courts· 1986-09-03

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Brady v. Maryland
  Supreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
• United States v. Agurs
  Supreme Court· 1976-06-24· cited 6,537×
• State v. Sobel
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1978-07-20· cited 56×
• Stipp v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1979-06-06· cited 30×
• Johnson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1971-06-15· cited 26×
• State v. Counce
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-01-28· cited 18×
• State v. Ritter
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-02-16· cited 9×