Lancaster v. Hamon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying motion to dismiss because, 17 among other things, the case was only seven months old and the plaintiff diligently responded to all 18 motions
• finding specific jurisdiction properly asserted in Oregon over nonresident defendants in TCPA case
• finding specific jurisdiction properly asserted in Oregon over nonresident defendants in TCPA case
• “This case has been pending only 20 seven months, during which time plaintiffs have diligently responded to each of 21 defendants’ numerous motions.”
• “[C]orporate officers may be 5 held individually liable under the TCPA if, as alleged here, they personally participated in 6 or otherwise authorized the commission of wrongful acts, even if done on behalf of a 7 corporation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).