Lancaster Hotel Co. v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that under Stone, “even if this Court believed that the state court had decided the [Fourth Amendment] issue wrongly . . . habeas relief could not follow.”
• stating that under Stone, “even if this Court believe that the state court had decided the [Fourth Amendment] issue wrongly . . . habeas relief could not follow”
• stating that under Stone, as long as a petitioner fully and fairly litigated his Fourth Amendment claim in state court, “even if this Court believed that the state court had decided the [Fourth Amendment] issue wrongly . . . habeas relief could not follow”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).