Lanauze v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding \reasonably anticipated use\ of pecan harvester included walking between tractor and harvester to inspect harvester while running
• holding “reasonably anticipated use” of pecan harvester included walking between tractor and harvester to inspect harvester while running
• “[Cjourts ‘must attempt to reconcile the jury’s findings, by exegesis, if necessary, before we are free to disregard the jury’s verdict and remand the case for a new trial.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).