Lanasa v. Harrison

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court did not err by relying upon the conclusions of an expert witness who reviewed an inadmissible highway safety report because the expert based his opinions upon his independent assessment of the evidence
• “[I]n all events such claims shall be filed at the latest within a period of three years from the date of the alleged act, omission, or neglect.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).