Skip to main content

Lampley v. State

Citations

  • 308 So. 2d 87

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that where sentence had become final, trial court was correct in refusing to resentence defendant
  • after considering Section 99-19-33, the Court held that Section 99-19-1 “expressly provided that the previous law will remain in effect for the purpose of providing punishment, unless otherwise specially provided in the new statute”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rodgers, Smith and Sugg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.