Lampkin-Asam v. Miami Daily News, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that in considering when a non-party witness may be commanded by subpoena to appear, a court’s only consideration is “the burden on the witness of being required to physically appear” (citations omitted)
• holding that in considering when a non-party witness may be commanded by subpoena to appear, a court’s only consideration is “the burden on the witness of being required to physically appear” (citations omitted)
• holding that subpoena could not be 24 quashed where moving party had only presented evidence of witness’s place of 25 1 The Rule carves out exceptions for parties, officers of parties, and trial witnesses. Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(c)(1)(B
• the only concern of Rule 45(c) is the burden to 6 the witness being required to physically appear
• “Jurisdictional analysis is inappropriate for analyzing Rule 45 3 because it responds to an entirely different set of concerns.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).