Lampe v. Pawlarczyk

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a postjudgment motion filed more than 30 days after the entry of the final judgment did not toll the time for filing the notice of appeal
• holding that the court's replacement of a trustee and its authorization to pay the trust's routine bills \ma[de] the proceeding similar to the administration of an estate and so capable of generating orders appealable under Rule 304(b)(1)\
• untimely postjudgment motion does not extend time to file notice of appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).