Skip to main content
· 6/28/1961

Lamonte v. Lamonte

Citations

  • 131 So. 2d 777
  • 1961 Fla. App. LEXIS 3296

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reiterating that the exception is not satisfied if the only -5- J-S04039-24 new aspect of the claim is that a new witness has come forward to testify regarding the previously raised claim
  • finding PCRA petition untimely where petitioner offered a new witness to attest to prosecutorial misconduct and petitioner had previously asserted such misconduct
  • relief denied where affidavit alleging perjury only supplied new witness to previously raised claims
  • witness’ affidavit alleging prosecutor’s corruption was not newly-discovered evidence sufficient to qualify appellant for exemption where claims of prosecutorial misconduct had -9- J-S10008-19 been alleged in every appeal and post-conviction petition since conviction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.